Judgment Header
Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan and Another [2010] SGHC 35
[2010] SGHC 35
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 Jan 2010Suit No 453 of 2009, Summons No 2957 of 2009/H and Summons No 2966/J
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“I accept Rodney Tan’s argument in this regard. As was stated in the case of Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan [2010] SGHC 35 at [15], an offer to settle a dispute without more cannot amount to an admission of legal liability in respect of that dispute because a person may wish to settle the dispute for various reasons”
“of reasons which do not relate to his legal liabilities or his views of them: Lim Tjoen Kong v A-B Chew Investments Pte Ltd [1991] 2 SLR(R) 168 at [32]; Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan and Another [2010] SGHC 35 (“Ng Chee Weng”) at [15]. In Ng Chee Weng, it was found that offers to settle did not amount to an admissi”
“t the 29 August Meeting are protected by Privilege. Where pleadings plead or disclose without prejudice communications, they are liable to be struck out: Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan and another [2010] SGHC 35 at [17]. In the instant case, the relevant pleadings referencing communications protected by Privilege du”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Ng Chee Weng v Lim Jit Ming Bryan and Another [2010] SGHC 35
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 453 of 2009, Summons No 2957 of 2009/H and Summons No 2966/J
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-01-29
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.