Judgment Header
Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) v Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103
Loading…
[2011] SGHC 103
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 Apr 2011Suit No 558 of 2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“) statement, certainty of terms, separate consideration and intention to be legally bound (Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd v Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103 (“Goldzone”) at [45]).”
“appellant, such as Wishing Star (HC) and The Pacific Vigorous, were made obiter and without full arguments and that other local cases such as Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd v Creative Technology Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103 (“Goldzone”) and Aero-Gate Pte Ltd v Engen Marine Engineering Pte Ltd [2013] 4 SLR 409 (“Aero-Gate”) gen”
“The court in Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) v Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103 summarised (at [45]) the requirements that need to be met for a finding to be made that an oral collateral contract was formed:”
“entering into the Employment Contract. In support of this submission, the Plaintiff cited Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) v Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103 (“Goldzone”) and the following criteria set out by Andrew Ang J (as he then was) at [45] for the formati”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Goldzone (Asia Pacific) Ltd (formerly known as Goldzone (Singapore) Ltd) v Creative Technology Centre Pte Ltd [2011] SGHC 103
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 558 of 2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2011-04-27
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.