Judgment Header
Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 177
General Division of the High Court of Singapore9 Sept 2014Suit No 540 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 7 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“e defendant may owe the plaintiff a common law duty of care under the tort of negligence. As outlined succinctly by George Wei JC (as he then was) in Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fey CDY Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 177 (“Chen Qiangshi”) (at [125]), the four-fold test for negligence is trite: (a) the defendant must have ow”
“I shall begin with the main question of whether the Defendant was negligent. As I have stated in Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177 (“Chen Qiangshi”) at [125], the four-fold test for negligence is trite: (a) the defendant must have owed the claimant a duty of care; (b) the def”
“In Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177 (“Chen Qiangshi”) , the plaintiff was a construction worker who was injured at the worksite when a rebar cage collapsed onto him while it was being lifted for repositioning. The first defendant was t”
“We now consider two other cases cited by Janaed. In Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177 (“Chen Qiangshi”), a rebar cage collapsed on the plaintiff as it was about to be lifted by a tower crane (at [5]). A rebar cage is a grid of interlocking steel bars that is utilised in the c”
“equisite standard of care; (c) the claimant has suffered loss; and (d) the defendant’s breach of duty was a cause of the claimant’s loss (Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177 at [125]).”
“In relation to negligence, the four-fold test is outlined in Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 177 at [125]: (a) the defendant must have owed the claimant a duty of care; (b) the defendant’s conduct must have breached the duty of care by falling below the requisite standard of care; (c) the”
“re by falling below the requisite standard of care; (c) the claimant suffered loss; and (d) the defendant’s breach of duty was the cause of the loss (Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fey CDY Construction Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 177 at [125]).”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Chen Qiangshi v Hong Fei CDY Construction Pte Ltd and another [2014] SGHC 177
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 540 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-09-09
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.