Judgment Header
Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd and another v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd and another suit [2014] SGHC 258
Loading…
[2014] SGHC 258
General Division of the High Court of Singapore1 Dec 2014Suit No 420 and 822 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 8 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“R 265; Lim Leong Huat v Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd [2009] 2 SLR(R) 318; The Dolphina, a company (‘Universal’) [2012] 1 SLR 992, Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 258 and PT Sandipala Arthaputra & Ors v STMicroelectronics Asia Pacific Pte Ltd 2018 [SGCA] 17. Indeed there”
“Lordships took towards non-assignment clauses in Linden Gardens has been accepted in Singapore, though not yet by the Court of Appeal. In Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 258 (“Total English”), Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) remarked, “Although [counsel] urged me to depart fro”
“In Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd and another v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd and another suit [2014] SGHC 258 (“Total English”), Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) observed, obiter, that “an equitable assignment would generally require the assignee to join the assignor to the action” [emphasis added] (at [51]”
“ress or implied terms which prohibit the defendant from using or disclosing the confidential information (see Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd and another v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd and another suit [2014] SGHC 258 at [82]; Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd v JCS Automation Pte Ltd and another [2014] 2 SLR 1045 at [155]–[158]). It”
“or disclosing the confidential information: Writers Studio Pte Ltd v Chin Kwok Yung [2022] SGHC 205 at [125]; Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd and another v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd and another suit [2014] SGHC 258 at [82]; Invenpro (M) Sdn Bhd v JCS Automation Pte Ltd and another [2014] 2 SLR 1045 at [155]–[158]. Cla”
“The Judge disagreed with the Debtor and affirmed the position in Linden Gardens, accepted locally in Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 258 (“Total English Learning”) (at [64]) and by the Singapore International Commercial Court in Arris Solutions, Inc and others v Asian Broadcasti”
“Trust Ltd v Lenesta Sludge Disposals Ltd [1994] 1 AC 85 (“Linden Gardens”), a decision which has subsequently been applied in Singapore in Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 258 (“Total English”). Linden Gardens stands for the rule that where there is a contractual prohibition on a”
“Linden Gardens has been accepted and applied in Singapore. In Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd [2014] SGHC 258 at [64], Tay Yong Kwang J (as he then was) declined to depart from the position as stated in Linden Gardens:”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Total English Learning Global Pte Ltd and another v Kids Counsel Pte Ltd and another suit [2014] SGHC 258
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 420 and 822 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2014-12-01
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.