Judgment Header
Ajit Chandrasekar Prabhu and another v Yap Beng Kooi and another [2015] SGHC 280
Court DecisionSGHC
[2015] SGHC 280
[2015] SGHC 280
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 Oct 2015Suit No 735 of 2013
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
This decision has been distinguished in a later judgment and cited in 2 other later decisions. Confirm it is still good law before relying on it.
- Distinguished by [2016] SGHC 268
Detected automatically from later judgments; not a substitute for a citator check.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“ff’s case, as it meant that the premises could continue to be used for their current purpose as a dormitory (attempting to distinguish Ajit Chandrasekar Prabhu and another v Yap Beng Kooi and another [2015] SGHC 280 and Chip Hup Hup Kee Construction Pte Ltd v Tng Peck Guek [2010] SGDC 351); and”
“in Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd v Abgarus Pty Ltd (1992) 33 NSWLR 504 (“Multiplex Constructions”), and the High Court’s decision in Ajit Chandrasekar Prabhu and another v Yap Beng Kooi and another [2015] SGHC 280 (“Ajit Chandrasekar”). Consequently, the defendant argues that it would only be liable for the plaintiff”
“I am fortified in my decision by Aedit Abdullah J’s conclusion in Ajit Chandrasekar Prabhu and another v Yan Beng Kooi and another [2015] SGHC 280 (“Ajit”) that newspaper articles are inadmissible under s 32(1)(b) of the Evidence Act. That provision reads as follows:”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 735 of 2013
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-10-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.