para
Introduction
[2019] SGHC 110
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 Apr 2019Suit No 815 of 2018
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
para
Introduction
1
This action was the second action filed by the plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) against the defendant, Chen Weiping (“Chen”), as guarantor of the obligations of Midas Holdings Limited (“Midas”). It was similar to the first action in Suit No 420 of 2018 filed by the Plaintiffs against Chen. The first action was in respect of “the Series 003 Notes” issued by Midas. The second action was in respect of “the Series 004 Notes” issued by Midas.
2
The background to the second action was the same as that to the first action.
3
On 7 November 2018, the Plaintiffs filed Summons No 5242 of 2018 for summary judgment against Chen.
4
On 4 December 2018, the Plaintiffs and Guo Bingqiang filed Summons No 5698 of 2018 to strike out the counterclaim by Chen against them.
5
Likewise, on 4 December 2018, Patrick Chew filed Summons No 5705 of 2018 to strike out Chen’s counterclaim against him and Summons No 5703 of 2018 to set aside Chen’s Third Party Notice against him. The Third Party Statement of Claim had apparently not been filed yet.
para
Decisions
6
As the arguments in respect of the four applications were the same as those in respect of similar applications made in the first action, the outcome was the same. I granted the substantive reliefs sought by the applicants in the four applications in the second action.
7
I am releasing my grounds of decision for the applications in the first action on the same day as these grounds for the second action. The grounds for the first action will also apply to the applications in the second action.
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.