para
Introduction
Court DecisionSGHC
[2022] SGHC 94
Urip Cahyadi v Henry Surya [2022] SGHC 94
General Division of the High Court of Singapore29 Apr 2022Suit No 682 of 2020
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
para
Undisputed Facts
para
Parties’ cases
para
Plaintiff’s case
para
Defendant’s case
para
The Law
para
My decision
para
The oral agreement itself
para
Documentary evidence
para
Before the 7 May Dinner
para
The 7 May Dinner
para
(1) The dinner itself
para
(2) Update from Joanne to plaintiff
para
After the 7 May Dinner
para
(1) No mention of the POA in WA correspondence
para
(2) No mention of the Oral Agreement in WA correspondence
para
(3) No mention of POA or Oral Agreement in lawyer’s correspondence
para
(4) No use of the POA as leverage
para
(5) Continued offers after PKPU judgment
para
(6) Conclusion on correspondence after 7 May Dinner
para
The value of the POA
para
Credibility of the defendant
para
Credibility of Hendra Widjaya
para
Adverse Inference
para
Misrepresentation
para
Conclusion
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.