Evidence Act 1893 · 2020 Revised Edition · Part 3 · Production and Effect of Evidence
157. Impeaching credit of witness
Feedback & supportLast amended by an amending law of 2012.
The credit of a witness may be impeached in the following ways by the adverse party or, with the consent of the court, by the party who calls him or her:
court
“court” includes all Judges and Magistrates and, except arbitrators, all persons legally authorised to take evidence;
by the evidence of persons who testify that they from their knowledge of the witness believe him or her to be unworthy of credit;
evidence
“evidence” includes —(a)all statements which the court permits or requires to be made before it by witnesses in relation to matters of fact under inquiry: such statements are called oral evidence; and(b)all documents produced for the inspection of the court: such documents are called documentary evidence;
by proof that the witness has been bribed, or has accepted the offer of a bribe, or has received any other corrupt inducement to give his or her evidence;
by proof of former statements inconsistent with any part of his or her evidence which is liable to be contradicted. Explanation.—A witness declaring another witness to be unworthy of credit may not, upon his or her examination-in-chief, give reasons for his or her belief, but he or she may be asked his or her reasons in cross‑examination, and the answer which he or she gives cannot be contradicted, though, if they are false, he or she may afterwards be charged with giving false evidence.Illustrations (a) A sues B for the price of goods sold and delivered to B. C says that C delivered the goods to B. Evidence is offered to show that on a previous occasion C said that C had not delivered the goods to B. The evidence is admissible. (b) A is indicted for the murder of B. C says that B, when dying, declared that A had given B the wound of which B died. Evidence is offered to show that on a previous occasion C said that the wound was not given by A or in his or her presence. The evidence is admissible.