In force2020 Revised Edition

Contents

Evidence Act 1893 · 2020 Revised Edition · Part 1 · Relevancy of Facts

Section 36

Feedback & support

Repealed

[Repealed by Act 4 of 2012]

Report

Read on from s 36A

Part 2

Proof

Read on from Part 2

Part 3

Production and Effect of Evidence

Read on from Part 3

Part 4

Bankers’ Books

Read on from Part 4

Part 5

Miscellaneous

Read on from Part 5

Schedules

Read on from Schedules

Details

Evidence Act 1893 · s 36

Saving and following need a free account.Sign in

Judgments that cite this Act

666 in all

The claimant failed to show the earlier charterer still controlled the ship when suing SummaryThe “VAYU” (formerly known as “QIAN TAI 1”) · [2026] SGHC 204
Qatar Holding LLC v Byju’s Investments Pte Ltd and another[2026] SGHC 217
Chan Yip Tong David ( alias Chan Sow Lang ) v Chan Yip Tong Franklin ( alias Chan Sow Fatt )[2026] SGHC 219

Where this comes from

Singapore Statutes Online · Evidence Act 1893, 2020 Revised Edition. Reader record updated on 7 Oct 2026.

Singapore legislation is Government copyright, used with the permission of the Attorney-General’s Chambers. Check Singapore Statutes Online for the latest version.

Open the official text