15. Deficiencies in applications
Feedback & supportLast amended by an amending law of 2014.
Where an application for a grant of protection does not satisfy the requirements of rule 11(1), the Registrar shall send notice of this to the applicant requiring the applicant to remedy any such deficiency.
Where the Registrar refuses to approve a proposed denomination under section 36(3) of the Act which has been submitted in the application, the Registrar shall send a notice to the applicant requiring the applicant to propose another denomination.
If the applicant fails to remedy all deficiencies set out in the notice referred to in paragraph (1), or propose another denomination in accordance with paragraph (2) within 2 months from the date of the notice, the application shall lapse in accordance with section 19 of the Act.
Subregulation 1
Where an application for a grant of protection does not satisfy the requirements of rule 11(1), the Registrar shall send notice of this to the applicant requiring the applicant to remedy any such deficiency.
Subregulation 2
Where the Registrar refuses to approve a proposed denomination under section 36(3) of the Act which has been submitted in the application, the Registrar shall send a notice to the applicant requiring the applicant to propose another denomination.
Subregulation 3
If the applicant fails to remedy all deficiencies set out in the notice referred to in paragraph (1), or propose another denomination in accordance with paragraph (2) within 2 months from the date of the notice, the application shall lapse in accordance with section 19 of the Act.