11+ results
Showing related results.
Bill 13 2026
—(1) When an SSG employee or a WSG employee is transferred to the service of the Agency under section 69(1) (called in this section a transferred employee), the transferred employee’s service with the Agency must be regarded for all purposes as having been co...
[2026] SGHC 2
SGHC2026-01-06Originating Claim No 293 of 2024
Accordingly, I find that the termination of Mr Kanan’s employment with HP and HP+ was lawful, and that they were entitled to terminate his employment immediately without notice or salary in lieu of notice.
[2025] SGHC 80
SGHC2025-04-28Suit No 848 of 2021
Given the evidence, the Plaintiff’s omission to seek employment could thus not be said to have arisen from reliance on any representation made to her. Rather, the evidence was strongly probative of the Plaintiff having made a lifestyle choice not to work outs...
[2025] SGHC 241
SGHC2025-12-03Originating Claim No 312 of 2022
The Court of Appeal has observed that restrictive covenants in the employment context are scrutinised far more strictly than those in other contexts due to considerations such as the disparity in bargaining power in an employee-employer relationship: Smile In...
[2025] SGHC 10
SGHC2025-01-21Originating Claim No 361 of 2023
[161] For the above reasons, I dismiss the claimant’s claim in its entirety. The claimant is to pay costs to the defendant to be assessed if not agreed.
[2024] SGHC 42
SGHC2024-02-13Suit No 994 of 2019
[153] With respect to the nappy rash cream, Mr Mani explained that the plaintiff needs the cream as she is always in diapers and seated or lying down for long periods of time. 286 Foot Note 286 × PRS at para 58. Mr Mani testified that a tube of nappy rash cre...
Bill 46 2024
—(1) When a transferring HPB employee or transferring MOH employee is transferred to the service of the Agency under section 51(1) (called in this section a transferred employee), the transferred employee’s service with the Agency must be regarded for all pur...
Bill 6 2022
—(1) Subject to subsection (4), a person who employs in Singapore an individual who is below 21 years of age (called in this section a young person) to conduct a betting operation, gaming or a lottery in or from Singapore in accordance with arrangements made...
[2022] SGHC 23
SGHC2022-01-28Suit No 242 of 2016
[3] I dismiss all of the plaintiff’s claims. The first claim is dismissed because it is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the relevant provision of his employment contract. The second claim is dismissed: (a) because the plaintiff has either fabricate...
[2021] SGHC 264
SGHC2021-12-23Suit No 253 of 2018
[123] More importantly, it would be apparent from the damages I have awarded for pain and suffering at [114] above, the quantum of the general compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff is entirely in line with the 2010 Guidelines and the precedents. As su...