Judgment Header
Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council [2015] SGCA 60
Court DecisionSGCA
[2015] SGCA 60
[2015] SGCA 60
Court of Appeal of Singapore27 Nov 2015Civil Appeal No 114 of 2015; Summons No 258 of 2015; Summons No 268 of 2015; Summons No 269 of 2015
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 2 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
2Later cases and laws citing this decision
“portal 21 [See Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society of Singapore [2001] 4 SLR 25 Singapore Court of Appeal, Chao Hick Tin JA at (18) and Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council [2015] SGCA 60; [2016] 1 SLR 915 Singapore Court of Appeal, Sundaresh Menon CJ at [39]]. [35] Access to justice is one of t”
“tal 19 [See Wee Soon Kim Anthony v Law Society of Singapore [2001] 4 SLR 25 Singapore Court of Appeal, per Chao Hick Tin JA at (18) and Attorney-General v Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council [2015] SGCA 60; [2016] 1 SLR 915 Singapore Court of Appeal, per Sundaresh Menon CJ at [39]]. Application of law to facts [”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Civil Appeal No 114 of 2015; Summons No 258 of 2015; Summons No 268 of 2015; Summons No 269 of 2015
Case Metadata
Court: Court of Appeal of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2015-11-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.