Judgment Header
Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank [2009] SGHC 194
Court DecisionSGHC
[2009] SGHC 194
[2009] SGHC 194
General Division of the High Court of Singapore27 Aug 2009Suit 174/2009, SUM 3788/2009
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“obligation to give inspection is to be fulfilled by providing the originals of the documents that are to be inspected, and not their copies (see, for example, Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank [2009] SGHC 194 at [37]–[39]). Where electronic documents are concerned, careful evaluation of its original source is nee”
“, although O 24 r 11 does not explicitly say so, a party’s right of inspection arises in respect of the originals of the documents in question (see, generally, Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank [2009] SGHC 194 at [37]–[39]; Charles Hollander QC MA, Documentary Evidence (Sweet & Maxwell, 18th Ed, 2021 (“Documentar”
“on relates to the originals of the documents in question (see Alliance Management SA v Pendleton Lane P and another and another suit [2008] 4 SLR(R) 1 at [35]; Fermin Aldabe v Standard Chartered Bank [2009] SGHC 194 (“Fermin Aldabe”) at [39]; Deutsche Bank AG v Chang Tse Wen and others [2010] SGHC 125 (“Deutsche Bank”)”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit 174/2009, SUM 3788/2009
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2009-08-27
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.