Judgment Header
Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General [2010] SGHC 345
Court DecisionSGHC
[2010] SGHC 345
[2010] SGHC 345
General Division of the High Court of Singapore24 Nov 2010Suit No 995 of 2004
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
4Later cases and laws citing this decision
“The first case is Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General [2010] SGHC 345 (“Linda Lai”). In Linda Lai, the plaintiff sued the Government for alleged wrongful termination of her employment contract with the Land Office division of the Ministry of Law (“LO”). The letter of a”
“took place before Lai Siu Chiu J (“the Trial Judge”) in August 2010. In her judgment released on 24 November 2010, the Trial Judge dismissed Ms Lai’s claim (see Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General [2010] SGHC 345 (“Linda Lai (Suit 995/2004)”)). The Trial Judge held that the termination of Ms Lai’s employment at the L”
“ices Ltd [1974–1976] SLR(R) 673 at [23], and by the High Court in Arokiasamy Joseph Clement Louis v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2002] 2 SLR(R) 924 at [50] as well as Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General [2010] SGHC 345 at [41].”
“v City Council of Singapore [1968-1970] SLR(R) 100 at [17], followed in Arokiasamy Joseph Clement Louis v Singapore Airlines Ltd [2002] 2 SLR(R) 924 at [50] and Lai Swee Lin Linda v Attorney-General [2010] SGHC 345 at [41]).”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 995 of 2004
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2010-11-24
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.