Judgment Header
Public Prosecutor v Amir Hamzah Bin Mohammad [2012] SGHC 165
Court DecisionSGHC
[2012] SGHC 165
[2012] SGHC 165
General Division of the High Court of Singapore13 Aug 2012Magistrate's Appeal No 6 of 2012
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Subsequent treatment
Cited in 3 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
How this case connects
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Cited by
3Later cases and laws citing this decision
“is conduct in making grave – and ultimately baseless – allegations against the police constituted an aggravating factor for sentencing purposes (per Chan Sek Keong CJ in PP v Amir Hamzah Bin Mohammad [2012] SGHC 165 at [19]). To be clear, I did not think the Accused should be penalised for testifying about his experien”
“law has established that an accused’s conduct in casting unjustified aspersions on the conduct of the police may be held to demonstrate a lack of remorse (Public Prosecutor v Amir Hamzah Bin Mohammad [2012] SGHC 165 at [19]). It was only at a very late stage of the trial that the accused came up with the allegations ab”
“to them. Case law has established that an accused’s conduct in casting unjustified aspersions on the conduct of the police may be held to demonstrate a lack of remorse (PP v Amir Hamzah Bin Mohammad [2012] SGHC 165 at [19]). In the present case, I found that the Accused’s belated − and unjustified – allegations against”
Authorities cited
0Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Case Metadata
Case No: Magistrate's Appeal No 6 of 2012
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2012-08-13
Something wrong on this page?
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.