Skip to content
laws.sgby aturio
Grounds publishedDecided 23 Sep 2026
Contents

General Division of the High Court

Wang Wai Keong (alias Wong Wai Keong) v Yahya Khan s/o Thamim and another

Feedback & support

[2026] SGHC 195Case no. Originating Claim No 297 of 2026 (Summons No 1831 of 2026)2 paragraphs

What happened, in plain English

There is no plain-English summary of this judgment yet.

Ask about this judgment

Grounds of decision

Official text from eLitigation

  1. Lee Seiu Kin SJ:

  2. Introduction

  3. [1] This is an application by the Claimant for a Mareva injunction to restrain the Defendants, one Thamim s/o Abdul Kassim (“Thamim”) and one Sirajunisha from dealing with, inter alia, a property at 5 Goodman Road, Singapore 438971.

  4. Facts

  5. [2] On 23 June 2026, counsel for the Claimant and Defendants appeared before me to submit on this application. However, counsel for the Defendants, having only been apprised of the matter the previous Friday, applied for an adjournment to file a reply affidavit. He also pointed out that the property in question was not owned by the Defendants but by their father, Thamim. The Claimant’s counsel then asked for an adjournment of one week to consider this point and take his client’s instructions.

  6. The parties’ submissions

  7. My Decision

  8. Conclusion

  9. Lee Seiu Kin Senior Judge of the High Court

  10. Patrick Fernandez and Mohamed Arshad bin Mohamed Tahir (Fernandez LLC) for the appellant;

  11. Harpal Singh and Kawal Pal Singh s/o Amarjit Singh (Tito Isaac & Co LLP) for the first defendant;

  12. Kawal Pal Singh s/o Amarjit Singh (Tito Isaac & Co LLP) for the second defendant.