Criminal Procedure Code 2010 · 2020 Revised Edition · Part 13 · General Provisions Relating to Proceedings in Courts
237. Change of judge during trial
Feedback & supportSubject to subsection (3), if a judge, having heard and recorded the whole or part of the evidence in a trial, is unable to complete the case, it may be continued by another judge who has and who exercises such jurisdiction.
subject
“subject” means a person who enters into a DPA with the Public Prosecutor.
The judge who continues the case may, in the interest of justice and without material prejudice to the parties to the proceedings —
Judge
“Judge” means a Supreme Court Judge, a Senior Judge or a Judicial Commissioner sitting in the General Division of the High Court in accordance with the Constitution and the Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1969;
act on the evidence recorded by his or her predecessor or recorded partly by his or her predecessor and partly by himself or herself; or
start the trial again by summoning the witnesses.
When there is a change of judge, any party to the proceedings may apply for any or all of the witnesses to be summoned and heard again and the judge must allow the application unless —
the witness is dead or cannot be found or is incapable of giving evidence or is kept out of the way by the party making the application, or the witness cannot be brought to court without unreasonable delay or expense; or
the court believes that the application is frivolous, vexatious or is made for the purpose of delay.
The appellate court may set aside any conviction made on evidence not wholly heard by the trial court which continued the case and it may order a new trial, if it believes that the accused’s defence on the merits has been materially prejudiced by the proceedings.
court
“court” means the Court of Appeal, the General Division of the High Court, a Family Court, a Youth Court, a District Court or a Magistrate’s Court (as the case may be) which exercises criminal jurisdiction;