Mr Speaker, Sir, before taking up the issues which were raised by Members yesterday and today, may I take the opportunity to touch briefly on one item which appears in the Budget Estimates under both the Ministry of Communications and the Ministry of Defence, namely, the subject of good conduct allowance. I would like tu congratulate the Member for Serangoon Gardens on having very arduously gone through this thick book of Estimates to find and draw attention to this item which has appeared year in and year out in the past without any Member making any reference to it. We all agree with him that as civil servants, and more so as policemen who are supposed to uphold law and order in this country, they are expected to show good conduct and, having conducted themselves well, there is no reason why they should be paid an allowance over and above what they should normally get. However, I am glad to inform this House that in time this item will disappear. I have been delving into the historical past to find out the whys and wherefores of this allowance being paid, but I regret to report that I have not been able to find any reason for it at all, except that, in looking through the files, I discovered that the allowance is an incentive for policemen not to sleep at their posts! I think the present lot of policemen need no incentive to stay awake at their posts. I am glad to report that since 1965 we have not been paying this allowance at all. As the years go by, the provision for this allowance will be less and less, and ultimately there will be none. Since I have referred to the Member for Serangoon Gardens, I may as well take up the issue which he raised yesterday and again today. His fear is that the constitutional rights of the citizens of Singapore will not be protected because we are abusing the powers that we have under the special detention laws to detain people for more than 24 hours and then bring them to court. I think every Member in this House is as zealous as he is to see that we protect the constitutional rights of our citizens. I dare not say that the powers given under the special detention laws have not been abused. Perhaps in their zest to rid this country of undesirable elements, officers in the police force may have made use of these powers. 3.30 p.m. But I can assure the Member that every precaution has been and will be taken to see that advantage is not taken of the special detention laws. The Member seems to impute that 438 persons were charged after detention of 24 hours. I doubt that very much, Sir. Probably a majority of them were charged within 24 hours. But I do wish to assure him and the House that I will take every precaution to see that advantage is not taken of the special powers under the detention laws. Coming to the Member for Mount-batten who wants to know why there is no provision under the Ministry of the Interior and Defence to celebrate our 150th anniversary next year, all I can say is that the planning and co-ordination for the celebration of this anniversary come under the Ministry of Culture. That is why there is no provision under my Ministry. The Member for Sembawang claims that members of the Vigilante Corps are given only one suit of uniform each. I wish to correct him. They are given two suits of uniform. They are not given transport allowance. But they can claim whatever money they spent on transport from the Commandant of the Vigilante Corps. The Member for Delta asked four questions. I can say that she is in very good company indeed when she wants to know how long the Australians are staying here. I think all of us want to know that. I would answer the question if I could, and things would be made much easier for us because we could then plan our defence with more precision. The Member's other question is: can we fill the vacuum left by the British military withdrawal? I do not believe any nation in Southeast Asia can fill the vacuum left by the British. In fact, I feel the British have probably calculated that they cannot hold their position in Southeast Asia as well as they could before, and that is one of the reasons why they are leaving. As regards the filling of the vacuum, we are building our armed forces in order to fulfil our share in trying to fill that vacuum, and that vacuum can only be filled either by a major power or by all the nations in Southeast Asia, extending as far as Australia and New Zealand, working together in concert for the security of this region. We are taking every step to prepare ourselves in order to play our part when the time comes when all these nations can work together for peace and stability in this area. The Member also asked whether there is any possibility of lowering the age of national conscripts. In the foreseeable future, Mr Speaker, Sir, I do not think there is a likelihood of our lowering the age of national conscripts. I say "in the foreseeable future", but if anything untoward happens, then we have got to find ways and means of increasing our manpower. The Member for Delta also wants to know whether the women's defence force are working under the same conditions as the men. I do not know what she means by working under the same conditions. They are not given the same kind of training physically. Our men conscripts have got to go through a very strenuous course of basic training which taxes them mentally and physically to the utmost. I do not think we can equate women with men here. Therefore, women are not given this training. But as regards pay, where they do the same kind of work we consider them equal and have given them equal pay. The Member for River Valley alleges that the dearth of manpower to help us in our economic growth is due to the national call-up. I cannot agree with him. He says that technical graduates of the Polytechnic and the University have been called up by my Ministry. If it had been so, my men and I would not be running around today trying to find technical men to man the positions that we have. Only graduates who have graduated since 1967 have been called up. So the figures he mentioned of 502 professional men and 1,043 technicians - I did not catch how many craftsmen there were - the majority of them are in industry. As regards reserving a proportion of these graduates to help in our industrial growth, I cannot promise him that because we are at the very outset of our build-up. Here again it is a question of priority - economic growth or defence capability. I would like Members to think that without this defence build-up, there may come a time when all the economic growth in the world will not stand us in good stead, because we would be captured and it would be too late to regret that we should have given priority to our defence build-up first.