Judgment Header
Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115
Loading…
[2008] SGHC 115
General Division of the High Court of Singapore16 Jul 2008Suit No 663/2008, RA 200/2008
Published judgment text with court metadata, source links, and stable paragraph anchors.
Cited in 4 later decisions. No negative treatment detected.
Citations and treatment detected automatically from later judgments and the authorities this decision relies on.
Later cases and laws citing this decision
“he appropriate response, having regard to the “drastic” effects of striking out an action or defence (Von Roll Asia at [43]). As stated by Chan Seng Onn J in Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115 at [64]:”
“hould be imposed as a result (see Mitora at [37]). In this respect, the court will be guided by considerations of proportionality (see Mitora at [39], citing Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115 at [64]).”
“Consistent with this principle, the High Court in Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115 regarded it as relevant that the defaulting party in that case had made reasonable positive efforts to locate the missing documents and that there was “no evidence of any intentional and contumelious”
“lity (Mitora at [37], [39] and [40]). In Mitora, the Court of Appeal cited with approval (at [39]) the guidance issued by Chan Seng Onn J (as he then was) in Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115 (at [64]):”
Earlier cases and laws this decision relies on
No outgoing citations detected.
Auto-detected from judgment text; not a substitute for a citator check.
Judgment Header
Teeni Enterprise Pte Ltd v Singco Pte Ltd [2008] SGHC 115
Case Metadata
Case No: Suit No 663/2008, RA 200/2008
Case Metadata
Court: General Division of the High Court of Singapore
Case Metadata
Decision Date: 2008-07-16
Wrong text, a broken link, out-of-date content, or a removal request — tell us and we'll check it against the official source.