34. Application to vary or revoke family exclusion order or family visit limit

An application to the Council under section 166(1)(a) of the Act to vary or revoke a family exclusion order or a family visit limit (called in this rule the relevant family exclusion order or the relevant family visit limit, as the case may be) must be made in such form as the Council may determine.

An application under paragraph (1) may not be made before a minimum period of 12 months has elapsed since the family exclusion order or family visit limit was made or last varied.

Every application under paragraph (1) must set out the grounds of the application in a clear and concise manner, and may be accompanied by —

any evidence that there is no longer a reasonable apprehension that —

the family respondent who is subject to the relevant family exclusion order may cause serious harm to his or her family members because of his or her gambling; or

the family respondent who is subject to the relevant family visit limit has engaged, or is likely to engage, in gambling activities irresponsibly, without due regard to the needs and welfare of his or her family members; and

such relevant testimonials, references and other information as the applicant considers necessary in support of his or her application.

The Council may refuse to consider any application that fails to comply with this rule.

An application to the Council under section 166(1)(a) of the Act to vary or revoke a family exclusion order or a family visit limit (called in this rule the relevant family exclusion order or the relevant family visit limit, as the case may be) must be made in such form as the Council may determine.

An application under paragraph (1) may not be made before a minimum period of 12 months has elapsed since the family exclusion order or family visit limit was made or last varied.

Every application under paragraph (1) must set out the grounds of the application in a clear and concise manner, and may be accompanied by —

any evidence that there is no longer a reasonable apprehension that —

the family respondent who is subject to the relevant family exclusion order may cause serious harm to his or her family members because of his or her gambling; or

the family respondent who is subject to the relevant family visit limit has engaged, or is likely to engage, in gambling activities irresponsibly, without due regard to the needs and welfare of his or her family members; and

such relevant testimonials, references and other information as the applicant considers necessary in support of his or her application.

The Council may refuse to consider any application that fails to comply with this rule.