Consumer Protection (Fair Trading) Act 2003 · 2020 Revised Edition · Part 4 · General
39. Parol evidence rule abolished
Feedback & supportDespite sections 93 and 94 of the Evidence Act 1893, parol or extrinsic evidence establishing the existence of an express warranty is admissible in any action relating to a consumer transaction between a consumer and a supplier even though it adds to, varies or contradicts a written contract.
consumer transaction
“consumer transaction” means —(a)the supply of goods or services by a supplier to a consumer as a result of a purchase, lease, gift, contest or other arrangement; or(b)an agreement between a supplier and a consumer, as a result of a purchase, lease, gift, contest or other arrangement, in which the supplier is to supply goods or services to the consumer or to another consumer specified in the agreement,but does not include any transaction specified in the First Schedule;
Subsection (1) is not applicable to establish the existence of any express warranty in respect of goods or services intended for business use.[17
goods
“goods” means —(a)any personal property, whether tangible or intangible, and includes —(i)chattels that are attached or intended to be attached to real property on or after delivery; and(ii)financial products and credit, including credit extended solely on the security of land;(b)any residential property; or(c)a voucher;