Enterprise Singapore Board Act 2018 · 2020 Revised Edition · Part 7 · Administration and Enforcement
47. Improper use of accreditation mark, certification mark, report or certificate
Feedback & supportA person must not use an accreditation mark or a certification mark, or a colourable imitation of an accreditation mark or a certification mark, in respect of any product or process or in any trade mark or design, unless the person —
accreditation mark
“accreditation mark” means an accreditation mark specified by the Board under section 6(2)(i)(iv);
holds a valid accreditation or certification authorising the person to use that accreditation mark or certification mark in respect of that product or process or in that trade mark or design; or (b)is authorised by the Board to use that accreditation mark or certification mark.
A person must not use any report or certificate issued or purportedly issued by or on behalf of the Board to convey the impression that the person holds a valid accreditation or certification, when in fact the person does not.
A person must not forge or without lawful authority alter an accreditation mark, a certification mark, or a report or certificate issued by the Board.
certification mark
“certification mark” means a certification mark specified by the Board under section 6(2)(i)(iv);
Any person who, without reasonable excuse, contravenes subsection (1), (2) or (3) shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $50,000 or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or to both.
Despite any provision to the contrary in the Criminal Procedure Code 2010, a District Court has power to impose the full penalty or punishment prescribed under subsection (4).
A court trying an offence under subsection (1), (2) or (3) may direct that any property in respect of which the offence has been committed be forfeited to the Government.