ESTIMATES OF EXPENDITURE FOR FINANCIAL YEAR - 1ST JANUARY, 1969, TO - 31ST MARCH, 1970
Mr Speaker, Sir, the Member for Serangoon Gardens brought up the question of getting the principals to make a greater contribution towards their professional work in education. I agree with him in principle that this suggestion is highly desirable. But my fear was well founded, as has been proved just now by the Minister's reply. The Minister said that he readily agreed to such a suggestion and that he would follow it up. However, at this juncture the principals will be asked again to do something which I think is quite beyond them. I may have to repeat what I said yesterday about the question of over-loading principals and teachers with unprofessional duties with the result that they are unable to contribute very significantly to their professional work. On the question of principals making a contribution towards educational matters, I do not want to sound too professional here. But I would like to quote just one example of teachers in other countries. In America, for example, after a number of years of service, teachers are given six months' full-pay, what they call Sabbatical leave. The purpose is to enable them to go to other countries and study for themselves the educational system there and also do some research work. I am not making a comparison and saying that we should do likewise. The point I want to stress is this. For professional people to be able to make a substantial contribution to their professional work, the one essential element is the time factor. There should be opportunities for these people to have the time to study and do research work. In the case of teachers, they should also be given time to travel and see things for themselves and make comparisons with different educational systems. Of course, I think the Minister knows the answer. In Singapore it is quite difficult for teachers to get this sort of leave, more so for principals. At present, the principals are less fortunate than the teachers. Although teachers are supposed to get a three-term holiday, they are expected to go to school and do a lot of things. But principals have got to be in school even during the holidays to carry out their duties. The question of leave for principals has never been settled. I am not here to raise the question of the conditions of service of teachers. I just want to point out to the Member for Serangoon Gardens this one obstacle which principals will have to encounter before they can carry out his suggestion. We have also to understand that the nature of the duties and the type of responsibilities of the principals have considerably increased since the last decade. As the Member for Telok Blangah has pointed out, a principal now has to look after two schools. Due to the shortage of school buildings, two schools are being run under one building. Now very conveniently the Ministry has called them two sessions of one school~ But when we compare the structure of the schools in our neighbour, Malaysia, with our own, we are in fact having two schools in one school building. The principal's responsibility is to look after these two schools. This is one additional responsibility which he has had to undertake since the last decade. As I said yesterday, we have made significant and impressive progress in our educational development. We have introduced integrated schools. At one time principals had to look after only one stream of education. Now they have to look after two or even sometimes three streams of education. It is not so much the size or the number of classes as the nature of the responsibility that is the problem. The educational system i'n the Chinese stream is different from that in the English stream. As a result, the timetables for the two different streams of education, with all the attendant problems arising from integration, have to be fitted in. In addition to integration, we now have the multi- purpose school, which is a sort of comprehensive school. If you talk about comprehensive education in England, and compare it with the type of schools that we have, the strength of their staff would be two or three times greater than that of our schools. As the Minister for Finance has said, Singapore is an island of 224 square miles at low tide. We are short of land. Therefore, school buildings have to go upwards. I believe that in some of the schools in Singapore they have as many as 48 classrooms in one school. There is no playing field. These are some of the problems which have come within the responsibility and duties of principals in the past few years. I also mentioned yesterday the lack of co-operation on the part of parents. Not only do they not show any special interest in their children's welfare in education, but sometimes they even obstruct the principals and teachers in the performance of their duties. One very common occurrence these days is for the children to complain to their parents on the slightest excuse. These complaints are readily accepted, and at one time almost welcomed, by the Ministry of Education and an immediate investigation would then be carried out. The poor principals and teachers would have to answer all these complaints. These are the types of problems which principals and teachers have to worry about and attend to. After grappling with them, I wonder how they can have the mental capacity, if at all they have the time, to make any significant contribution towards improving their professional work. Nevertheless, some efforts have been made towards this end. I can only say that from my association with the Singapore Teachers' Union, some modest efforts have been made towards professional improvement. Representatives from principals and teachers have met together and have drawn up a code of ethics. We have occasionally produced journals in connection with our profession. We have also met to discuss matters of professional interest. We have on numerous occasions made representations to the Minister and the Ministry officials on matters of professional interest. The Education Ministry did organise a seminar for principals. The Singapore Teachers' Union also made an effort to follow up that seminar by offering to organise seminars for teachers. However, we were told that the Education Ministry itself was following this up with further seminars for teachers. I must say that the Education Ministry has, in fact, organised refresher courses and re-training courses for teachers. I think the teachers are today spending a great deal of their time outside teaching hours trying to improve themselves by attending these courses. I do not think I have much to say at this juncture. I am not really trying to be too pessimistic about the contributions from principals and teachers. I can confidently say that the teachers would be more than willing to make their contribution, not only by spending extra hours in teaching or taking part in extramural activities, but also in producing papers on matters of professional interest to education. But like people in other professions, principals and teachers need one very important element if they are to make any contri bution towards their profession, and that is peace of mind. There should be less interruptions in their professional duties. They should be given the opportunity to do research work and thus make their contribution in the field of education.