Gambling Control Act 2022 · Updated to 21 Sep 2026 · Part 9 · Enforcement
120. Immunity for complying with blocking orders
Official textFrom Singapore Statutes Online, unchanged
No criminal or civil liability is to be incurred —
by an internet service provider or an officer or agent of such provider; or
by a financial institution, a financial transaction provider, or an officer or agent of a financial institution or financial transaction provider,for anything done or omitted to be done with reasonable care and in good faith in complying with any access blocking order or payment blocking order, or purported access blocking order or payment blocking order, as the case may be.
In this section, an “officer” of an internet service provider, a financial institution or a financial transaction provider includes an employee of the internet service provider, financial institution or financial transaction provider.
internet service provider
“internet service provider” means a provider of an internet access service;
Terms defined in s 116
access blocking order
Defined · s 116“access blocking order” means an order under section 117(1) to disable access to an online location;
internet service provider
Defined · s 116“internet service provider” means a provider of an internet access service;
payment blocking order
Defined · s 116“payment blocking order” means an order under section 118(1)(b) or (3) to block specified transactions;
Spot a mistake in this text? Suggest a correction.
Part 10
Administration
Part 11
Miscellaneous
Part 12
Amendments to Casino Control Act 2006
Part 13